Edward Hutton did not admire the facade of Siena's Duomo but he did find much to admire in the interior. Many thanks to my friend David Orme for the images.
In so many of the cathedrals of Italy, the façade has little or no relation to the church which lies behind it; and here in Siena it might seem we have the most flagrant example of this fault. The façade of the Duomo of Orvieto, it is true. Errs in the same way, though not so manifestly, for there at least the noble central door, so much larger than its fellows on either side, emphasizes the importance of the nave over the aisles, while here the three doors are of equal height. But this is by no means the only cause of Siena’s inferiority. As a façade pure and simple, that of Orvieto is noble and lovely in design, in decoration, and in colour. That of Siena is feeble in design, it suffers from too much decoration, and this is of a mean sort, and who but a fanatic can admire its colour? It fails everywhere in comparison with the work of Orvieto—it fails in order and in beauty. And if in its completeness it may not be compared with its sister at Orvieto, it fails, too, in its detail. At Orvieto sculpture has, with very happy effect, been more sparingly used, but what there is, is of a better and nobler kind. … (105)
If one is always disappointed with the façade of the Cathedral, what is one’s final impression of the interior? At first certainly you are bewildered and confused by those bands of black and white marble which so unfortunately diminish the spaciousness of what is, after all, a very spacious building; they halve its height and breadth and rob it of its dignity. But when, if ever, you have become accustomed to this oddity, you recognize that what charms you in a building full of contradictions is that in it which carries out the idea of all Latin building, an effect, yes, in spite of every sort of handicap, an effect of light and space, not so splendid certainly as you will find in such masterpieces as the Cathedrals of Pisa and Lucca or in the church of S. Croce in Florence, but light and space nevertheless, here where the fundamental feeling is rather Romanesque than Gothic, the predominating lines horizontal rather than perpendicular; and the decorations of the church, mainly of the Renaissance as they are, confirm the impression we receive from the building itself. … (111)
But the finest and most interesting work of art in the Cathedral is the pulpit by Niccolo Pisano.… The plan is the same as that for the pulpit in the Baptistry of Pisa, but the work is richer and more clairvoyant. Octagonal in form, it possesses two more bas-reliefs than the pulpit of the Pisan baptistry, namely, the Massacre of the Innocents and a second scene of the Last Judgment. But in every relief, we find a more dramatic life and an art more naturalistic than in the earlier work. It is a masterpiece a little uncertain of itself, perhaps, but full of a new promise of joy.… (115)
###
Edward Hutton: Siena and Southern Tuscany, New York, 1910.
D.O. comments:
ReplyDeleteAn Interesting piece. Hutton doesn’t like the black and white marbling inside, but I think it gives the building great character. He is very dismissive of the façade, but, interestingly, the Wikipedia article on the duomo rates it as one of the finest in Italy. I have to agree, though, that Orvieto is even better.
What he doesn’t mention is the Duccio maesta, now in the duomo museum but one of the world’s greatest artworks. The mosaic floor too deserves a mention, though it is covered up for most of the year – luckily, on our two visits it was uncovered. The Piccolomini library too is full of fine art. I doubt we shall get the Siena again, but our memories and photographs bring it to life!